It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 8:40 pm

Board index » General » WoodsBuggy Talk

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:57 pm 
Offline
WB Contributor

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:14 pm
Posts: 1418
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
but ain't the junk yard full of acura tps's for $20?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:23 am 
Offline
WB Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 1212
Location: Chattanooga Tennessee
Great Idea Passat. I have a fairly rare type-s engine that uses a non standard throttle body perhaps
a normal Acura uses the same sensor. Didn't think of that.

_________________
Water Cooled Consortium, Chairman of the Build (Former AC purist)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:53 am 
Offline
WB Contributor

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:14 pm
Posts: 1418
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
I'm just a junkyard junkie.Pull a Part is my playground.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:01 am
Posts: 321
Location: Butler, PA
Red Barron wrote:
Quote:
You don't need exotic fuel with an Ecotec, it will put enough power to the ground where the only problem then is hooking up. With a speed density tune based on VE tables then yes, the differences in fuel matters so you have to be consitent in what you use. Retaining the original GM system as designed will allow you to burn
various qualities of fuel and never need TurboBlue, CAM2, avition gas, etc. Don't need propane either.Once you go WC it is hard to look back IMHO.


I would have to agree with a knock sensor, mass air flow, and O2 sensor who needs exotic fuels I run 87 in an engine that recommends 93 and it hauls the mail. The only thing that sucks is when you loose a throttle position sensor and have to buy a whole throttle body from the dealer. I love my Acura but they love there parts $320 wholesale ouch. :evil: :evil: :evil:

07 Cobalt motor, stock harness, ECM $390.00 from Ray's Auto Sales. :D :D :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
WoodsBuggy Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 2039
Location: Central Indiana
Rick wrote:
kevin f wrote:
Runs great and clean in my motor, nevfer had an issue at all. I took some fuel from a rocket brand can once and poured it in a glass and I could see stuff floating all in it. AV gas is the cleanest fuel ive found and will always run it until im proven wrong.

X2 av gas is the best. 100 octane low lead and its not just designed for constant rpm load...there's a little more to it than that :roll:



Read this............we in a sense are running a racing style engine.
The eye roll wasn't necessary as my statement does have merit.

http://www.osbornauto.com/racing/race2avgas.htm

I am going to attempt to address the controversy of aviation gasoline verses racing gasoline for use in race cars. Some racers use aviation gasoline which is fine for some applications but does have shortcomings. There are several grades of aviation gasoline (avgas) that we must identify before going any farther.

1. Avgas 80/87: this product is used in low compression ratio aircraft engines, contains little or no lead, is red in color, and should not be used in any automotive engine due to a low motor octane number of about 80.

2. Avgas 100/130: this product that can be used in some automotive engines. It has both research and motor octane numbers slightly over 100. Avgas 100/130 is green in color, contains four grams of lead per gallon, and is becoming harder to find.

3. Avgas 100 LL: the LL stands for "low-lead" which means two grams per gallon, low compared to the avgas 100/130 that it was designed to replace. It has research and motor octane numbers very similar to the 100/130 product previously discussed. The color is blue. This product sometimes has a high level of aromatics which can contribute to lazy throttle response and dissatisfaction of the consumer.

4. Avgas 115/145: this product was developed for high performance piston aircraft engines used in world war II and in the Korean war. It is very hard to find anymore due to lack of demand although it is of very high octane quality. The color is purple.

The remainder of this discussion will assume that our basis for comparison with racing gasoline is avgas 100/130 and/or 100 LL since they are both available and have acceptable octane quality for limited applications. When the word "avgas" is used, it will refer to avgas 100/130 or 100 LL.

Avgas is less dense than most racing gasolines. Instead of weighing about 6.1 to 6.3 pounds per gallon like racing gasoline, it weighs 5.8 to 5.9 pounds per gallon. The racer must compensate for this by changing to richer (larger) jets in the carburetor when changing from racing gasoline to avgas.

The other major difference is octane quality. Avgas is short on octane compared to most racing gasolines. Many racing engines with "quick" spark advance curves or with no centrifugal advance have more spark advance at low rpm than avgas and some racing gasolines can handle. The result is detonation, especially during caution periods in circle track racing because all of the spark advance is "in", rpm is low, and part throttle air fuel ratios are too lean for the operating conditions. If the driver does not "work" the throttle back and forth, pistons can be "burned" which melts away part of the aluminum piston material. Inadequate octane quality is one of the quickest ways to destroy an engine. Pistons can be severely damaged during one acceleration where detonation is present and the racer may not know what is happening until it is too late.

For maximum performance and power from a racing engine, racing gasoline will normally provide better performance than avgas. Avgas can be a good gasoline for some applications, but since most racers do not know the octane requirement of their engines, they would be better off with a "real" racing gasoline that will give them the overall resistance to detonation that they need to protect their investment. If someone has spent from $15,000 to $50,000 or more on their racing engine, it is foolish to cut corners on gasoline be sure you have a gasoline with adequate octane quality.

_________________
Gary

Turbo VW Sand Racer
Polaris Ranger



"If you don't run into the Devil every once in awhile, you must be going in the same direction!"

Davis Motorsports FaceBook Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:44 pm
Posts: 976
Location: franklin indiana
That's good reading and if i were running a roundy round race car, as that cat was speaking of i would run race full...as for my vw a/c i will run av gas and do just like that ole boy said and work the throttle :D

_________________
Air cooled forever,i hate rusty tools!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:22 pm 
Offline
WoodsBuggy Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 2039
Location: Central Indiana
Rick wrote:
That's good reading and if i were running a roundy round race car, as that cat was speaking of i would run race full...as for my vw a/c i will run av gas and do just like that ole boy said and work the throttle :D


Got a point.
My buggy is 10:1 and I use pump gas with a bit of octane boost and don't ever hear any detonation.
But again I'm more of a putter than a thrasher anymore.
These old bones won't take the beating they used too.......... :wink:

_________________
Gary

Turbo VW Sand Racer
Polaris Ranger



"If you don't run into the Devil every once in awhile, you must be going in the same direction!"

Davis Motorsports FaceBook Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Racing fuel.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:33 pm 
Offline
WB Contributor

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:25 pm
Posts: 1304
Location: tuscaloosa alabama
Both of my buggys are 11.5 to 1 motors. They wont run worth a crap on any fuel with octane booster. Ive ran sunoco 110 a good bit and really cant tell a difference performance wise when running av gas.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » General » WoodsBuggy Talk

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group