It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 6:25 am

Board index » Tech and Fab » Air Cooled Engines

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 214
Location: cortland, Ohio
I currently run a 2165 with dual Idf 40”s and a 6 rib. Just picked up an engine for parts and found out it’s a 1915 with 041 Mofoco heads (not ported)….Surprise!!! :shock: :shock: It aperies to have a stock cam, but has been welded and custom ground??? So I plan to port the heads and freshen it up and keep for a spare. So my question is; What valve train should I set this up with so I can make little changes to my carbs? What is every ones opinion on ratio rockers?? What size and when to use them?? I want this little thing to scream but still be able to run pump gas. Thanks for everyone’s opinions and comments in advance.

_________________
Dont' be be scared. When it dought floor it!


Last edited by rip-it on Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 214
Location: cortland, Ohio
106 views????? Does anybody have at least an opinion? :? I’m thinking a 110 cam because that is what everyone else seems to go with, at least for a woods buggy? But what about the rockers? :?:

_________________
Dont' be be scared. When it dought floor it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:29 pm 
Offline
BOTM Winner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:01 pm
Posts: 793
Location: LUCASVILLE OHIO
110 cam and 1.25 rockers and make sure you use a 5 rib tranny great combination

_________________
"It is easy to be brave from a safe distance."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
X2 w110 or c35 1.25 scat racing rockers and dual valve springs chromoly retainers . or a fk 41or42 and 1.4 rocker will work good .or vz 14 and 1.1 rockers The fks 41&42 are short duration but hi lift .510 to.522 with ported heads should make alot of TQ and mid-range power . Comperssion will help the TQ alot . Pump gas 93 octane 9.5to1 50/50 race gas pump gas 10.5 to1 100% race gas 11 and up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:24 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Cincy oh
Ive got the mini wedgeports 1.25 rockers intakes matched 9 to 1 pump gas. Runs swell taken out plenty bigger motors. My buddies will confirm. Fun motor. . On cb performance go to builders choice engine kits. Pretty cool

_________________
LET ER EAT !!! If you aint first, your LAST.!!.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 214
Location: cortland, Ohio
Thank you: pipedope, wrongwayray, hyde :wink: :!: :!:

I’m pretty sure it’s going to end up with a 110 cam, 1.25 rockers and 9.5:1

_________________
Dont' be be scared. When it dought floor it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:54 am
Posts: 285
Location: owensboro ky
I run c45 and scat 1.25 rockers with 5 rib super diff! I do run vp 110!

_________________
Don't let out when in doubt!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline
WB Videographer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:24 pm
Posts: 731
Location: Sevierville, Tn.
Engle fk7 with 1.4 rocker on my 1914
Excellent torque and rpm

_________________
A good friend will bail you out of jail. A best friend will be sitting next to you saying: "Damn that was fun!"


Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5wGMaUMXUQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 711
Location: hayden, al
i also run a 2165,110 cam, got dual 40 dellortos with 2BR VW heads (40x35.5 valves), had em fly cut with 11.1 comp. got all the other go fast goodies except the ratio rockers...have thought about getting them but would it make that big a difference with my set up??? (483 trans, 38 buckshots)

_________________
LEGALIZE BLUEGRASS!!!

Save a tree... eat a Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 711
Location: hayden, al
..1.25, 1.3, or 1.4s???

_________________
LEGALIZE BLUEGRASS!!!

Save a tree... eat a Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 711
Location: hayden, al
is it a difference through the entire RPM range or more of a bottom or top end gain???

_________________
LEGALIZE BLUEGRASS!!!

Save a tree... eat a Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:08 pm 
Offline
WB Videographer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:24 pm
Posts: 731
Location: Sevierville, Tn.
Depends on cam, the fk7 was designed for 1.4 rockers.
I chose it due to lower duration 288 and higher lift 0.50, I wanted a cam that would bring in the torque at lower rpm but still turn up,comes on strong about 2600 rpm. Nice powerband. Pulls to 6300.
Higher duration cams are for high rpms and they cost you low end torque.
A 110 cam with 1.25 rockers duration 284 lift .491

_________________
A good friend will bail you out of jail. A best friend will be sitting next to you saying: "Damn that was fun!"


Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5wGMaUMXUQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 349
Location: Germantown Ohio
I would go no more than 1.25 rockers on a 110 cam. More lift will give more low end torque because of better cylinder filling capabilities at lower RPM. I know alot of people will argue,but 11:1 is WAY too much compression for a 110 cam or any cam with duration that low.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
reno2165 wrote:
is it a difference through the entire RPM range or more of a bottom or top end gain???

When you us ratio rockers you ad lift and a litte duration. Most of the time it helps the entire RPM range you will need dual valve springs and chromoly retainers .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
Maddog wrote:
Depends on cam, the fk7 was designed for 1.4 rockers.
I chose it due to lower duration 288 and higher lift 0.50, I wanted a cam that would bring in the torque at lower rpm but still turn up,comes on strong about 2600 rpm. Nice powerband. Pulls to 6300.
Higher duration cams are for high rpms and they cost you low end torque.
A 110 cam with 1.25 rockers duration 284 lift .491

I would like to try a fk41 ad duration 269 .050 239 and .510 lift with 1.4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
WB Videographer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:24 pm
Posts: 731
Location: Sevierville, Tn.
hyde wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Depends on cam, the fk7 was designed for 1.4 rockers.
I chose it due to lower duration 288 and higher lift 0.50, I wanted a cam that would bring in the torque at lower rpm but still turn up,comes on strong about 2600 rpm. Nice powerband. Pulls to 6300.
Higher duration cams are for high rpms and they cost you low end torque.
A 110 cam with 1.25 rockers duration 284 lift .491

I would like to try a fk41 ad duration 269 .050 239 and .510 lift with 1.4

I think I might have a new favorite cam fk41.
That's the lowest duration I ever seen for a cam with that much lift.
Jake Raby has the dyno for it here http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/s ... php?t=4539
I'm gonna look hard at that one for the next engine.

_________________
A good friend will bail you out of jail. A best friend will be sitting next to you saying: "Damn that was fun!"


Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5wGMaUMXUQ


Last edited by Maddog on Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 711
Location: hayden, al
is 11:1 too much? this is the first motor ive built and it does what i ask, jus lookin for a lil more..ive learned alot since it was put together and probably would have done it different..its a good topic and looking for opinions

_________________
LEGALIZE BLUEGRASS!!!

Save a tree... eat a Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
reno2165 wrote:
is 11:1 too much? this is the first motor ive built and it does what i ask, jus lookin for a lil more..ive learned alot since it was put together and probably would have done it different..its a good topic and looking for opinions

Compression will help make TQ .Just run race gas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 711
Location: hayden, al
all she drinks is the blue fast gas..

_________________
LEGALIZE BLUEGRASS!!!

Save a tree... eat a Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
Maddog wrote:
hyde wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Depends on cam, the fk7 was designed for 1.4 rockers.
I chose it due to lower duration 288 and higher lift 0.50, I wanted a cam that would bring in the torque at lower rpm but still turn up,comes on strong about 2600 rpm. Nice powerband. Pulls to 6300.
Higher duration cams are for high rpms and they cost you low end torque.
A 110 cam with 1.25 rockers duration 284 lift .491

I would like to try a fk41 ad duration 269 .050 239 and .510 lift with 1.4

I think I might have a new favorite cam fk41.
That's the lowest duration I ever seen for a cam with that much lift.
Jake Raby has the dyno for it here http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/s ... php?t=4539
I'm gonna look hard at that one for the next engine.

With some ported heads it would go up in RPMs a litte more


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 349
Location: Germantown Ohio
reno2165 wrote:
is 11:1 too much? this is the first motor ive built and it does what i ask, jus lookin for a lil more..ive learned alot since it was put together and probably would have done it different..its a good topic and looking for opinions

I'm sure it runs just fine. As Hyde stated, higher comp gives more torque. An engine with hi compression can utilize more cam duration and still retain great torque numbers along with running cooler and being overall more efficient. A camshaft should be the very last piece of any engine build so it can be matched to the rest of the components for a great overall package.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 214
Location: cortland, Ohio
Thanks guys, good info!! :wink:

_________________
Dont' be be scared. When it dought floor it!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

Board index » Tech and Fab » Air Cooled Engines

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group