It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 1:22 pm

Board index » Tech and Fab » Air Cooled Engines

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Velosity stacks size????
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:14 pm
Posts: 840
Location: Highland Heights,Kentucky
I have always been curious about the size of velosity stacks that are available. Ive got a set of the stock 1.5in and a set of 6in. What are the pros and cons of each because these 6in ones just look sick as hell on my carbs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
I ran a 2387 on a DTS dyno & it made 20 fp more TQ at 2500 with 6" stacks over the 2" the tall stacks helped with fuel stand off.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:14 pm
Posts: 840
Location: Highland Heights,Kentucky
So they will probably make a little more with some air actually running into them while running through the woods,right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
My eng ran better from idel up to 3500 .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:40 pm 
Offline
WB Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 1125
Location: Gadsden TN
hyde wrote:
I ran a 2387 on a DTS dyno & it made 20 fp more TQ at 2500 with 6" stacks over the 2" the tall stacks helped with fuel stand off.



was that with the air filters (and if so how tall ) or w/out ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
aboone993 wrote:
hyde wrote:
I ran a 2387 on a DTS dyno & it made 20 fp more TQ at 2500 with 6" stacks over the 2" the tall stacks helped with fuel stand off.



was that with the air filters (and if so how tall ) or w/out ?

no air filters on the dyno . I run 9" tall with foam


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:49 am 
Offline
WoodsBuggy Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:37 am
Posts: 2737
Location: moulton,al
hyde wrote:
I ran a 2387 on a DTS dyno & it made 20 fp more TQ at 2500 with 6" stacks over the 2" the tall stacks helped with fuel stand off.


what is this fuel standoff your talking about ?

if its when the fuel "mists" up in the air above the stacks i have that problem and was wondering what caused it and how to "fix"it if it is a problem or will make the buggy run better

_________________
Just Stand On It!!!!

Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
YES The intake valve opens before the piston reach top dead center so at low rpm when you open the throttle . Compression can go up the intake. In a nut shell that is why we run small cams & puting velosity stacks on make the intake loanger & keep the air going in the cylinder . call i can talk you through it 812-584-7644


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:08 am
Posts: 234
Location: Ladysmith B.C. Canada
You just side tracked me with your mention of small cams. In the last month or so, came upon some cam comparisons. Started wondering if Scats C-25 would be to small for a 2276cc with 1:1.25 rockers. If I remember right, it's similar to Engles 110. Don't know wether to start a new thread or not, but would like more info. Thanks Dave W.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
Dave its the c-35 & 110


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:08 am
Posts: 234
Location: Ladysmith B.C. Canada
Thanks. So the C-25 probably is on the light side then. I know that there are a lot of variables, but any idea as to what kind of performance it might deliver?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:54 am
Posts: 690
Location: Girard, Ohio
My 2180 has a 110 cam. Im gonna run 1.25's on it which should give me .490 lift or so. I already have 4" stacks to run inside my 6" filters on my 40's. It should be on the torquey side. If I can fix the valve size issue easily with Turbo2332's heads Ill use the 44's on it if I get em. Either way 4" stacks are a good compromise.

Anybody run jet extensions? I always wondered if they help.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 783
Location: mooers hill IN
A c-25 is a small cam in a 2276 . I think a c-35 or 110 would work better . c-25 272 ad dur .050 234 dur lift 1.25 ro .365 c-35 285 ad du .050 246dur lift 1.25 ro .476 w110 284 ad dur .050 247 lift 1.25 ro .490 But i do not no what parts you have or buggy or trans & so on


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

Board index » Tech and Fab » Air Cooled Engines

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group